Danique Knibbeler

Portrait of Danique
Danique Knibbeler specialises in the field of data protection law, and is part of the Technology Group and the Benelux Data Protection Team at NautaDutilh. She advises and assists (international) clients in various sectors, including technology, the financial sector, government, energy, telecom & media, and healthcare & life sciences, in the field of privacy, cybersecurity and AI. She is also a frequent speaker at seminars and conferences, guest lecturer at universities, and regularly publishes articles and blogs on various platforms and in legal journals.
Read more

Prior to joining our firm, Danique gained extensive practical experience as in-house counsel and data protection officer in various sectors. She has worked for various government institutions, a health insurance copany and as a Global Data Protection Officer at an international high-tech company, where she also advised on privacy legislation outside the European Union. This experience enables Danique to provide advice that closely aligns with practice.

Danique has successfully completed several courses: Privacy Officer in 2018 (Outvie), Certified Data Protection Officer in 2019 (Outvie) and the post-academic Grotius specialisation course in Privacy Law (cum laude) in 2021. She is currently following the specialisation course Cybercrime & Cybersecurity at Leiden University.

She is admitted to the Amsterdam Bar Association and is a member of various associations, including the Privacy Law Association (VPR), the AI Lawyers Association (VAI-A), Young Privacy Lawyers Netherlands (JPAN), the Dutch Association for Information Technology and Law (NVvIR) and the Dutch Lawyers Committee for Human Rights (NJCM). She has also been selected as an expert for the European Data Protection Boards's (EDPB) Support Pool of Experts (SPE).

  • Publications & media

    This article looks at recent legal developments in relation to collective redress for breaches of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In particular, it examines the interpretation of Article 80 of the GDPR, which allows interest groups to act on behalf of data subjects. The article analyses the historical context and explanation of this article, as well as its relationship with the Directive on representative actions. It also discusses the implications of recent litigation, including that against TikTok. The authors argue that the European legislator has deliberately avoided allowing collective damages without a mandate in order to prevent a potential culture of litigation. The conclusions of the Amsterdam court in the TikTok case are questioned, and the article anticipates further rulings that will hopefully provide more clarity on this complicated legal issue. Read the full article for in-depth analysis and updates on ongoing cases (in Dutch).

Cookie notification

This functionality uses third-party cookies. Change your cookie preferences to view this content or view more information.
These cookies ensure that the website works properly. These cookies cannot be disabled.
These cookies can be placed by third parties, such as YouTube or Vimeo.
By deactivating categories, it is possible that related functionalities within the website may no longer work properly. It is always possible to change your preferences at a later time. View more information.